By Gloria Nosa
In a surprising revelation, the White House has confirmed that former President Donald Trump continues to express interest in the idea of Canada becoming the 51st state of the United States. According to sources close to the matter, Trump has brought up the notion on multiple occasions, framing it as a bold geopolitical move that would benefit both nations economically and strategically.
While the idea has no official backing or feasibility under current diplomatic frameworks, insiders say Trump has informally floated the concept during private discussions and speeches, suggesting that a closer integration between the U.S. and Canada could strengthen North America’s global influence.
“President Trump has always thought big,” a senior White House aide said. “He believes Canada and the U.S. already share so much in terms of culture, trade, and security. In his view, making Canada the 51st state would be the ultimate expression of that partnership.”
The idea, however, has raised eyebrows both in Washington and Ottawa. Canadian officials have reportedly dismissed the proposition as unrealistic and out of step with the country’s values and sovereignty. Political analysts have also pointed out the legal and constitutional impossibilities involved, emphasizing that Canada is an independent nation with no intention of surrendering its autonomy.
Despite the pushback, Trump’s comments have reignited conversations online, with supporters applauding his “big picture” thinking and critics accusing him of disrespecting international boundaries.
This isn’t the first time Trump has made unconventional geopolitical suggestions. During his presidency, he famously proposed purchasing Greenland from Denmark — an idea that was quickly rejected by Danish authorities.
While Trump’s vision of Canada as the 51st state remains far from becoming reality, the statement reflects his continued interest in reshaping global alliances and challenging traditional norms. Whether this idea gains any traction remains to be seen, but for now, it’s sparked fresh debate on the boundaries of U.S. foreign policy — and imagination.
